And that’s relevant, how?
How, exactly, does whether or not someone surrendered, have to do with whether they are good or bad?
That’s right. It doesn’t.
Day: August 18, 2025
bookmark_border“Midland Legacy did last longer than the confederacy…”
So? And this is relevant, how?
Also, take this similar comment: “The Crunchwrap supreme lasted longer than the confederacy so we should name it after that”
And what exactly is the connection between how long something lasted, and how deserving it is of having a school named after it?
How exactly are these things related?
What exactly is the relationship between how long something lasted, and its goodness or badness?
If a child dies, say of cancer, or an accident, does that mean that the child wasn’t important, and doesn’t deserve to be memorialized, merely because their life didn’t last very long?
Or, if someone is raped, or has their limbs blown off in a terrorist attack, does that mean that these experiences weren’t important, and didn’t actually harm the person significantly, merely because they didn’t last very long?
I’m confused about the connection between how long something lasted, and it’s goodness or badness.
I’m confused about why people think that there is one.
Because logically, it doesn’t seem like there should be.