No commentary necessary:
View this post on Instagram
Source here
Marissa's musings about liberty, individual rights, justice, grief, loss, and other random things
Tulsi Gabbard’s arrival at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. So cool!
View this post on Instagram
Source here.
I saw this post by Charlie Kirk a while back and was struck by the attitude that California Governor Gavin Newsom expresses in the third slide:
View this post on Instagram
“You don’t believe in climate change. You are excused from this conversation.”
Excuse me? So because Trump doesn’t share the same beliefs as Newsom, he is “excused” from the conversation?
In other words, Newsom seems to be saying, only people with the same beliefs as him are allowed to participate in the conversation. Only people with the same beliefs as him are allowed to voice their opinions.
News flash: Gavin Newsom does not have the right to dictate who is allowed to participate in a conversation and who is not. He does not have the right to dictate which people are and are not allowed to voice their opinions.
I am so tired of these types of pompous, self-righteous, stuck-up, and condescending statements. People need to actually listen to those who are different from them, or at least respect those who are different from them, rather than mindlessly condemning and shaming them as Newsom does.
I couldn’t help but laugh out loud at this one. Beautiful work!
View this post on Instagram
Source here
View this post on Instagram
The most important sentence in this post: “the ability to impose those same views on others.” The controversy about RFK (which shouldn’t exist, because everyone should unanimously support him) is a conflict between two groups, one of which believes that the products and services of big food, big pharma, and the medical industry are good for people’s health, and the other of which believes the opposite. But the biggest thing at issue here isn’t what is healthy and what is not. It’s whether individuals should be able to make their own decisions about their health. Not only do RFK / MAHA opponents blindly follow the recommendations of the medical industry, but they believe that everyone else should be forced to do so as well. While RFK / MAHA supporters believe that every person should be able to make their own decisions.
And that’s what makes RFK’s critics morally wrong. Even more problematic than their erroneous beliefs about what is healthy, is their erroneous belief that they have the right to impose their own beliefs on others. The fact that it is morally wrong to require people to undergo a medical procedure shouldn’t be even remotely controversial. The right of people to make their own medical decisions should not be political.
“No one elected Elon Musk,” Democrats have been pompously stating (see an example here).
This statement is angering for several reasons:
First of all, it is hypocritical. As various commentators on the post linked above have pointed out, no one elected Kamala Harris, or Bill Gates for the matter, yet Democrats aren’t complaining about them.
Second, a good argument can be made that people did, indeed, elect Elon Musk. As DC Draino explains in the post linked above, Trump campaigned with Musk and made it clear that Musk would play a role in his government. Trump also campaigned on the idea of cutting wasteful government spending, which is exactly what Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency are doing. A majority of people voted for Trump, knowing that Musk would be part of his administration; therefore people did, arguably, elect Musk.
Third, even if no one elected Elon Musk, so what? Because taxation is morally bad, and government spending requires taxation, government spending is morally bad. Spending should be kept to an absolute minimum in order to keep taxation to an absolute minimum. Therefore, the steps that Musk and DOGE have taken to cut government spending are morally good. And this is true regardless of whether anyone elected Musk, and regardless of whether anyone voted in favor of the things that Musk and DOGE are doing. Moral right and wrong are completely independent of what anyone voted for.
As Robert Kroese points out in a tweet that is quoted in the post linked above, “I didn’t vote for the FBI, ATF, CIA, PBS, NPR, FDA, WHO, UN, IRS, Federal Reserve, EPA or CDC.”
And I didn’t vote for the historical figures that I love to be brutally murdered, or for all people who work at a company with over 100 employees to be forced to undergo a medical procedure.
Yet Democrats did these things anyway.
For them to pompously condemn and shame Musk and Trump for actually doing something good with the government, is reprehensible.
Some great news from the Department of Defense and Department of Transportation:
View this post on Instagram
View this post on Instagram
I’m not sure whether other departments are doing the same thing under the Trump administration (it would be great if they are), but I came across these two posts and find this truly awesome. Black History Month, Women’s History Month, AAPI Heritage Month, Hispanic Heritage Month, and American Indian Heritage Month all have one thing in common: they are discriminatory. As the post from Secretary Duffy points out, these are celebrations based on immutable traits. These months, and other similar celebrations, honor some people while ignoring and excluding others. It’s not OK to celebrate women but not men, or to celebrate black, Asian, Hispanic, and indigenous people but not white people. Celebrating some people but not others is unfair, unjust, hurtful, and morally wrong. Kudos to the Trump administration for taking a stand against this.
President Trump made good on his promises to rename the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America, and to restore the name of Denali back to Mt. McKinley. (I blogged about the latter back in December, which you can read about here.)
As the Instagram account Italiani4Trump points out, the new name Gulf of America honors Italian explorer and navigator Amerigo Vespucci.
View this post on Instagram
And of course, the name Mt. McKinley honors President William McKinley, who unjustly had his name removed from the tallest mountain in America by President Obama back in 2015.
According to Fox News, Google Maps is updating its maps to reflect the new names.
View this post on Instagram
This is fantastic news, and I am truly hoping that these name changes honoring deserving historical figures are only the beginning…