bookmark_borderThe immorality of Chris Murphy

I agree 100% with the following post from the Firearms Policy Coalition:

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy)

To implement a $4,709 tax on gun products is mean-spirited and despicable. By proposing doing so, Murphy demonstrates his aggressive bigotry and his contempt for people who are different from him. 

Sickeningly, the organization Brady United Against Gun Violence thanked Murphy “for introducing this critical amendment to strike the provision in the big UGLY bill that removed taxes on deadly silencers & other uniquely lethal weapons, and instead adjust taxes to reflect inflation today.”

First of all, Murphy’s amendment is not “critical” – it’s actually critical not to pass an amendment like Murphy’s because it violates people’s rights. Second, the bill in question is not “UGLY” as Brady nastily claims. It is called the Big, Beautiful Bill, and for the most part it lives up to that name. Third, taxes on silencers and other gun products should not be adjusted to reflect inflation. They should be eliminated, exactly as the provision in the Big, Beautiful Bill does, because people are not doing anything wrong by buying these products, and therefore should not be punished with an exorbitant tax for doing so.

Both Chris Murphy as an individual, and Brady as an organization, are dedicated to hurting people who are different from them, punishing people who have done nothing wrong, and violating people’s fundamental rights, They act as if hurting and punishing innocent people somehow gives them the moral high ground, when in reality that is the exact opposite of the truth. Seeing them sycophantically praise each other for their hurtful and mean-spirited actions is disgusting. It’s about time that these actions and words be called what they are: immoral.

bookmark_borderRespecting people’s fundamental rights is not “weak”

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy)

“A gunman from a state with weak gun laws”

As a commenter on the post wrote, “‘Weak gun laws’ you mean states that don’t infringe on the 2nd amendment.”

Yup. States that actually – gasp! – respect people’s fundamental rights. Can’t have that, apparently.

News flash, Governor Hochul: Respecting people’s fundamental rights is not “weak.”

It’s a basic moral obligation.

It’s basic human decency.

There’s nothing “strong” about punishing innocent people for the actions of others.

There’s nothing “strong” about violating people’s fundamental rights.

How about, when a person does something bad, we actually blame the person, rather than blaming the government for not violating the rights of all people in an attempt to prevent a person from doing something bad?

Just a thought.

bookmark_borderGood news on Robert E. Lee highway marker in Charleston, SC

Some good news out of Charleston, South Carolina: the Robert E. Lee highway marker that was removed by intolerant bullies as part of the statue genocide will be coming back! The highway marker, which was cruelly removed on July 20, 2021, will be put back up in a prominent location within the city. The American Heritage Association sued to reverse the removal, and its president, Brett Barry, said: “President Trump has provided Americans an opportunity to turn the tide in the historical monument debate, and we are succeeding.”

Although this is only one small victory in the fight to reverse the statue genocide, it is a step in the right direction.

Source: Dixie Forever

bookmark_border“Hate has no home here”

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Glory Glory (@oldgloryglory)

Bingo!

I would also add, hate for people who have trouble making friends, people who are bullied, people who don’t fit in, people who think for themselves, people who hold minority views, people who resist authority, people who decline medical interventions, and people who are different from the norm in any way.

bookmark_border“To ban guns because the criminals use them…”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Mary J. Ruwart, Ph.D. (@maryjruwart)

No one’s rights or liberties should ever, ever depend on the conduct of other people.

No one should ever have their rights or liberties taken away because of the actions of others.

To do so is to punish one person for the actions of another. And punishing people for the actions of others is never, ever okay.

bookmark_borderJefferson Davis’s life and legacy

Just a quick post to express my gratitude to Beauvoir, Jefferson Davis’s home and presidential library, for existing and for keeping his legacy alive.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Beauvoir (@beauvoirbiloxi)

It is indeed important to learn about Davis’s life and legacy, and I’m thankful that this historical site teaches visitors about this, rather than mindlessly condemning him and centering the perspectives of the majority, as most museums and historical sites have done due to the ideology of conformism and political correctness. People who are different from the norm, and who stand up to authority, deserve to have their legacies kept alive as well. Davis is an excellent example of one such person. I value his legacy and am glad that Beauvoir does as well.

Beauvoir maintains an active social media presence, and you can follow them on Instagram here. Salute!

bookmark_border“No kings in America…”

No kings in America…

But yes to mandatory medical procedures.

Yes to society collectively making decisions about which risks people should be allowed to take, rather than people making decisions about risk for themselves.

No kings in America…

But yes to viciously tearing down statues of those who fought for the losing side of a war.

Yes to obliterating all representation of people who are different from the norm, in our public spaces, in our society, in art and culture.

No kings in America…

But yes to the criminalization of political dissent.

Yes to demanding unquestioning, unthinking submission.

Yes to mindless compliance with social norms.

Yes to morally condemning the entire concept of rebellion, of revolution, of resistance to authority.

Yes to using the terms “insurrectionist” and “traitor” as pejoratives, as if the concept of resisting authority is so self-evidently shameful and bad that it ought to be used as an insult.

No kings in America…

But yes to tyranny, authoritarianism, and totalitarianism.

That is the message of the “No Kings Day” protests.

bookmark_borderRally against Zohran Mamdani’s bigotry

Yesterday the Italian American Civil Rights League held a rally yesterday to protest against NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s bigotry. I fully support and agree with the IACRL on this issue and will explain in detail why Mamdani’s words and actions regarding Christopher Columbus are so reprehensible and despicable in a later blog post. For now, here are a few posts about the rally:

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Gerard Marrone (@gerard_marrone)

Post from the IACRL here.

bookmark_borderChronic venous insufficiency is not funny

File this under the category of, “things that shouldn’t need to be stated.”

I stumbled across this post in my Facebook feed.

Nothing remarkable about the post itself. Like many people, I’ve heard the news that President Trump has been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, a common condition for older people which means that he experiences swelling in his legs and will likely start wearing compression socks.

What is remarkable, and not in a good way, is what I saw in the lower left corner of the post: the fact that the most common reaction that readers had to this post was the “laughing face.”

Out of the 1,600 people who reacted to this post, a plurality reacted with laughter.

Hundreds of people think that President Trump being diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency is funny.

What the heck is wrong with these people???

Why on earth would someone think that a person being diagnosed with a medical condition is funny?

What kind of person laughs at another person’s medical diagnosis?

I simply do not understand this reaction. I don’t get it. At all. It is baffling to me.

I can’t imagine ever finding a public figure’s medical diagnosis to be humorous, no matter how much I disliked the public figure.

It’s difficult to find a better example of the meanness, the nastiness, the cruelty of the progressive left than this.

In our society, we hear again and again about the “cruelty” of the Trump administration, the “intolerance” of right-wing ideology, the idea that conservatives “lack empathy” for those different from themselves. Yet it is the progressive left that chooses to respond with humor, with mocking, with ridicule, with laughter when a person that they dislike is diagnosed with a medical condition.

This behavior is actually cruel.

This behavior is actually intolerant.

This behavior is what actually demonstrates a lack of empathy.

The progressive left has absolutely no claim to the moral high ground when they choose to react with laughter to the president’s medical diagnosis. Every time they accuse the right of cruelty, intolerance, or a lack of empathy, they demonstrate their own complete and utter hypocrisy.

Perhaps someone should visit the profile pages of each of the people who left a “laughing face” reaction to this WMUR news story, and scan their profile pages for any mention of a health struggle or medical diagnosis, affecting either the person themselves, a family member, or a friend. Then, that someone should leave a “laughing face” reaction on each of these posts. I wonder how these people would enjoy being the recipient of their own behavior. I wonder if they would still consider health problems to be funny, if they or their family members or friends were the ones being made fun of.

To state the obvious truth that I alluded to at the beginning of this blog post, the fact that President Trump has been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency is not funny. If it weren’t for the moral bankruptcy of the progressive left, such a thing wouldn’t need to be stated. But unfortunately, it does.